Certifications

OEKO-TEX Standard 100 vs GRS: which one do you actually need?

7 min read · Updated September 2026

Two certifications come up constantly in PSF buyer conversations. They sound similar, they overlap in marketing language, and they cover very different things. Here's the actual distinction, with the practical decision tree.

The one-line answer

OEKO-TEX Standard 100 tests the finished product for harmful substances. GRS verifies the recycled content and chain of custody. They answer different buyer questions.

What OEKO-TEX Standard 100 actually does

OEKO-TEX Standard 100 is a product safety certification. It tests the textile for substances that could be harmful to human health (formaldehyde, heavy metals, pesticides, phthalates, azo dyes, etc.) at levels safe for skin contact. The test is done on the finished fabric or article, not on the fiber alone.

For PSF, the certification is typically held by the finished fabric mill, not the fiber producer. The fiber mill may also hold a "pre-certification" or "raw material certification" that supports the downstream mill's OEKO-TEX claim, but the official OEKO-TEX Standard 100 label is on the fabric.

What it proves to your buyer: the final product doesn't contain harmful substances above OEKO-TEX thresholds. Required for baby/kids textiles, underwear, bedding sold in EU and many US retailers, and any product with skin contact.

What GRS actually does

GRS (Global Recycled Standard) is a content and chain-of-custody certification. It verifies:

The PSF producer can hold a GRS scope certificate covering the fiber production, and issue transaction certificates (TCs) per shipment. The fabric mill or brand can then issue their own GRS claim based on the supplier's TC.

What it proves to your buyer: the recycled content is real, audited, and traceable. Required for any product marketed with a recycled content claim in EU, US, and increasingly other markets.

Side-by-side

Dimension OEKO-TEX Standard 100 GRS
Tests whatHarmful substances in the finished productRecycled content + chain of custody
HolderFinished fabric / article millPSF producer (and onward through supply chain)
Buyer question it answers"Is this safe against skin?""Is the recycled claim real?"
Cost to you$0 (downstream cost)~$0.10-0.15/kg fiber premium
Cost to your buyer$1-3k/year testingTC fee + chain-of-custody setup
Marketing claim"Tested for harmful substances""X% recycled content"

Decision tree: which one do you need?

  1. Does your buyer market recycled content? If yes → GRS. Mandatory if you want to make a recycled claim.
  2. Is the end product for skin contact (baby, underwear, bedding)? If yes → OEKO-TEX Standard 100 on the finished product. Your fiber may not need its own OEKO-TEX, but the downstream mill almost certainly does.
  3. Are you selling into EU retailers with sustainability commitments? If yes → both are likely required, depending on the brand's specific framework (Higg, ZDHC, EU Ecolabel, etc.).
  4. Domestic commodity sales (no recycled or safety story)? Then you don't need either yet. Wait for buyer or regulation to drive it.

Common confusion points

The short version

OEKO-TEX is product safety. GRS is recycled content. They're complementary, not competing. If your downstream needs both, the typical stack is GRS on the PSF (fiber producer) + OEKO-TEX Standard 100 on the finished fabric (fabric mill). Don't pay for one when you actually need the other.

Need help mapping which cert your downstream actually needs?

Send us your buyer's tech pack or compliance questionnaire. We'll tell you which certifications are required and which are nice-to-have, with actual cost impact on the PSF quote.

Send a tech pack